Discuss , our SFTP/FTP/FTPS/SCP server for Windows. Secure, fast and customizable!
no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

Query Regarding Complete FTP Server Capabilities

by huwgb » Fri Jun 07, 2013 9:53 am

Hello
We are in the process of evaluating the Complete FTP Server to see if it meets our needs.
History:
The company I am currently working for purchased a 1 year license for CompleteFTP Server Professional several years ago. Due to complications listed below the product was never actually used and the organisation let the license expire. I have the enviable task of tracking down the technical issues that caused the product to remain unused several years ago and see if they can be rectified with newer versions of the Server or Client.


We have the following situation:
1. AIX Server will Push a file via SFTP to a Windows Complete FTP Server using its own FTP Client. The File will be in ASCII(Unicode) with Line Endings set to (LF). The expected encoding will be ASCII(Windows) with Line Endings set to (CR LF)

2. A custom java application using EnterpriseDT edtFTPj/PRO will take the file, log details about it and push it to a z/OS mainframe using FTPS. It should be received by z/OS in the EBCDIC format with newline characters converted appropriately

When we tested this situation several years ago (with CompleteFTP Server 4.1) we discovered that the line endings in step 1 were not being converted from (LF) to (CR LF). I believe this was the fault of the FTP client on the AIX server, possibly also the fault of the SFTP protocol as it does not handle Data Types as cleanly.

When we tested step 1 with Line endings manually set to CR LF the entire process worked.
When we left it as above the file appeared on a single line on the z/OS server.
We were not able to put a process in place on the AIX side to manually change the line endings before the file push due to possible conflicts with other legacy applications calling the same SFTP scripts.

Given the above restrictions. Does the newer versions of CompleteFTP Server have the capabilities to automatically change the line endings for incoming files to match ASCII(Windows), either through custom scripts/extensions, overriding whatever Data Type is pushed from the client or by some other method.

If we were to upgrade to CompleteFTP Server Enterprise edition, would the Multi-Protocol Gateway have the capability to convert line endings as the situation above requires?

The answer provided will help us determine whether a license renewal/license upgrade for EnterpriseDT CompleteFTP Server is warranted or if it will continue to sit unused in the organisation.

Note: I do not have permission to make a decision regarding the purchase of an EnterpriseDT license, I can only pass any findings along.
no avatar
User

support2

Posts

3987

Joined

Tue May 18, 2004 8:30 am

Re: Query Regarding Complete FTP Server Capabilities

by support2 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:35 am

Step 1 should work - but it may be that the SFTP AIX client does not support ASCII transfers. SFTP does not have ASCII and binary mode transfers like FTP does - it is up to the client to transform the EOL chars based on what OS it thinks the server is using.

If the client can't be fixed, there's a couple of options:

1) You are already using edtFTPj/PRO - why not use it for the SFTP client on AIX? It will allow you to transfer in ASCII mode.

OR

2) It should be relatively straightforward to use a process trigger on CompleteFTP to run a script (like unix2dos) to change the line endings to what they should be.
no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:02 am

no avatar
User

EDT Support

Posts

905

Joined

Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:03 pm

by EDT Support » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:20 am

no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:25 am

no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:13 am

no avatar
User

support2

Posts

3987

Joined

Tue May 18, 2004 8:30 am

by support2 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:58 am

no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:11 am

no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:20 am

Well.
I have gotten the request submitted to see about re-licensing the server so we can update it.

In the meantime.
http://www.enterprisedt.com/products/co ... acros.html
has no mention of %WindowsPath%
Yet
http://www.enterprisedt.com/products/co ... pting.html

mentions %WindowsPath%, as does the version history.

Is my understanding correct that %FilePath% will return the FTP Filesystem path whereas %WindowsPath% will return where the file is physically located on the hard drive?
no avatar
User

support2

Posts

3987

Joined

Tue May 18, 2004 8:30 am

by support2 » Thu Oct 03, 2013 8:47 am

That understanding is correct.

We'll amend the list to include %WindowsPath%
no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 am

Regarding the Enterprise edition. Especially with regards to Clustering.
I note it stated that clustered sites could be used for failover or load balancing.
Is there anything in place for automatic load-balancing or failover? Or does it come down to the connecting FTP client application pointing to the correct IP Address.
I am curious to see if we should be requesting a license upgrade rather than a license renewal in order to address some high availability concerns.

Also:
http://www.enterprisedt.com/products/co ... tings.html
specified a %FileLength% variable with the following description: "Length of the file in bytes, kB, MB or GB"

Can we use the formatting options to force the FileLength to always return bytes? So far when playing with the trial version of the software I have not been able to accomplish this.
no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:53 am

Well, it appears as though approval has been given to renew the support license, so hopefully I can actually start development soon instead of design
no avatar
User

EDT Support

Posts

905

Joined

Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:03 pm

by EDT Support » Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:25 am

no avatar
User

huwgb

Posts

18

Joined

Wed Jun 05, 2013 2:39 pm

by huwgb » Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:42 pm

no avatar
User

EDT Support

Posts

905

Joined

Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:03 pm

by EDT Support » Wed Oct 30, 2013 11:34 pm

Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign
cron